2011-10-27 52 views
0

我想基于最大值或最小值来聚合行,其中最大/最小值由业务规则而不是固有值确定。换句话说,我需要创建一个自定义的最大/最小值 - 不使用CLR。我在下面的代码片段中有一个独立工作的例子,但我觉得必须有一个更简单的方法。查找最大/最小任意优先级

在这种特殊情况下,我需要IPA列的业务优先级由以下[IPAMap] CTE中显示的[Seq]值定义。然后,我从[TestData] table/cte(本示例中只有四行)中取任意一组行,并根据优先级将它们聚合成两行,并选择适当的IPA值。

--Table [IPAMap] holds all possible values for [IPA], and reflects the relative 
--'priority' of each with the [Seq] column. This table is used as a lookup for 
--business rules. 
;WITH IPAMap (Seq, IPA) AS ( 
SELECT 1, 'Q' UNION ALL 
SELECT 2, 'S' UNION ALL 
SELECT 3, 'A' UNION ALL 
SELECT 4, 'L' 
) 
--Table [TestData] represents the real data. 
, TestData (CustomerID, IPA) AS ( 
SELECT '123', 'A' UNION ALL 
SELECT '123', 'S' UNION ALL 
SELECT '234', 'L' UNION ALL 
SELECT '234', 'Q' 
) 
--Table [PartyIPASeq] finds the lowest Seq rank from [TestData] 
,PartyIPASeq (CustomerID, IPASeq) AS ( 
SELECT 
    CustomerID, 
    MIN(IP.Seq) 
FROM TestData [TD] 
    INNER JOIN IPAMap [IP] ON IP.IPA = TD.IPA 
    GROUP BY CustomerID 
) 
--The final selection provides the key and the 'IPA' with the lowest rank 
SELECT TD.CustomerID, TD.IPA 
FROM TestData [TD] 
INNER JOIN IPAMap [IP] ON IP.IPA = TD.IPA 
INNER JOIN PartyIPASeq [SEQ] ON SEQ.CustomerID = [TD].CustomerID 
    AND SEQ.IPASeq = IP.Seq 

上述查询的结果是这样的:

CustomerID IPA 
234   S 
123   Q 

这是正确的,但我希望有人能告诉我一个更简单的方法来完成同样的工作。

+0

你的'DISTINCT'是多余的。使用'GROUP BY'可以保证结果集中的行是不同的。 –

+0

@Mark:固定 - 删除它。 –

+0

你可以在聚集中使用CASE语句,MIN(CASE MA.IPA WHEN 3 THEN 7 WHEN 4 THEN 6等)但是我怀疑这是简单得多还是高性能的,除了导致稍微简单的执行计划。如果映射不改变,为什么不把它们放在永久性的桌子上? – carpii

回答

0

貌似答案是使用窗口函数与CHARINDEX的订单通过,像这样:

WITH TestData (CustomerID, IPA) AS ( 
    SELECT '123', 'A' UNION ALL 
    SELECT '123', 'S' UNION ALL 
    SELECT '234', 'L' UNION ALL 
    SELECT '234', 'Q' 
    ) 
SELECT CustomerID, IPA 
FROM (
     SELECT CustomerID, 
     IPA, 
     ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY CustomerID ORDER BY CHARINDEX(IPA, 'QSAL')) rownum 
     FROM TestData 
    ) A 
WHERE rownum = 1 

如果业务数据采用多字符值,则CHARINDEX被替换为PATINDEX功能。