出于好奇,我决定尝试反编译我的项目代码。我拿着Assembly.dll文件并使用ILSpy对其进行反编译。它似乎工作正常,除了IEnumerator<>
方法。反编译IEnumerators
IEnumerator sP()
{
for (int i = 0; i < maxEnemies; i++)
{
var p = Porczaks[Random.Range(0, Porczaks.Length)];
Instantiate(p, new Vector3(Random.Range(245, 360), 16.8f, Random.Range(292, 366)), Quaternion.Euler(0f, Random.Range(0f, 359f), 0f));
yield return new WaitForEndOfFrame();
}
}
...是例如被解码成这样:
[DebuggerHidden]
private IEnumerator sP()
{
WaveManager.<sP>c__Iterator7 <sP>c__Iterator = new WaveManager.<sP>c__Iterator7();
<sP>c__Iterator.<>f__this = this;
return <sP>c__Iterator;
}
有没有办法准确地反编译该IEnumerator
?
编辑:我反编译使用dotPeek反编译器相同的组件,它创造的方式更多的代码。虽然我仍然不知道,如果变量可以在.NET中有这样的名字:
// Method sP with token 060000AB
[/*Attribute with token 0C000051*/DebuggerHidden]
private IEnumerator sP()
{
WaveManager.\u003CsP\u003Ec__Iterator7 sPCIterator7 = new WaveManager.\u003CsP\u003Ec__Iterator7();
sPCIterator7.\u003C\u003Ef__this = this;
return (IEnumerator) sPCIterator7;
}
// Type <sP>c__Iterator7 with token 02000031
[/*Attribute with token 0C000026*/CompilerGenerated]
private sealed class \u003CsP\u003Ec__Iterator7 : IEnumerator<object>, IEnumerator, IDisposable
{
// Field <i>__0 with token 040000C7
internal int \u003Ci\u003E__0;
// Field <p>__1 with token 040000C8
internal GameObject \u003Cp\u003E__1;
// Field $PC with token 040000C9
internal int \u0024PC;
// Field $current with token 040000CA
internal object \u0024current;
// Field <>f__this with token 040000CB
internal WaveManager \u003C\u003Ef__this;
// Property System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator<object>.Current with token 17000017
object IEnumerator<object>.System\u002ECollections\u002EGeneric\u002EIEnumerator\u003Cobject\u003E\u002ECurrent
{
// Method System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator<object>.get_Current with token 060000EA
[/*Attribute with token 0C00006E*/DebuggerHidden] get
{
return this.\u0024current;
}
}
// Property System.Collections.IEnumerator.Current with token 17000018
object IEnumerator.Current
{
// Method System.Collections.IEnumerator.get_Current with token 060000EB
[/*Attribute with token 0C00006F*/DebuggerHidden] get
{
return this.\u0024current;
}
}
// Method .ctor with token 060000E9
public \u003CsP\u003Ec__Iterator7()
{
base.\u002Ector();
}
// Method MoveNext with token 060000EC
public bool MoveNext()
{
uint num = (uint) this.\u0024PC;
this.\u0024PC = -1;
switch (num)
{
case 0:
this.\u003Ci\u003E__0 = 0;
break;
case 1:
this.\u003Ci\u003E__0 = this.\u003Ci\u003E__0 + 1;
break;
default:
return false;
}
if (this.\u003Ci\u003E__0 < this.\u003C\u003Ef__this.maxEnemies)
{
this.\u003Cp\u003E__1 = this.\u003C\u003Ef__this.Porczaks[UnityEngine.Random.Range(0, this.\u003C\u003Ef__this.Porczaks.Length)];
UnityEngine.Object.Instantiate((UnityEngine.Object) this.\u003Cp\u003E__1, new Vector3((float) UnityEngine.Random.Range(245, 360), 16.8f, (float) UnityEngine.Random.Range(292, 366)), Quaternion.Euler(0.0f, UnityEngine.Random.Range(0.0f, 359f), 0.0f));
this.\u0024current = (object) new WaitForEndOfFrame();
this.\u0024PC = 1;
return true;
}
this.\u0024PC = -1;
goto default;
}
// Method Dispose with token 060000ED
[/*Attribute with token 0C000070*/DebuggerHidden]
public void Dispose()
{
this.\u0024PC = -1;
}
// Method Reset with token 060000EE
[/*Attribute with token 0C000071*/DebuggerHidden]
public void Reset()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
似乎dotPeek没有处理<
和>
正确的,但是这是值得的代码什么?
这确实看起来像编译器会产生什么。 – Enigmativity
说了JetBrains dotPeek似乎在这方面做得更好。 – Enigmativity
我检查过dotPeek,并且在代码中禁用显示标记时,它看起来几乎与ILSpy中的代码相同,但随着启用它,它变得非常混乱。我在第一篇文章中发布了代码。它有任何意义吗?如果我只是将名称从“ __ + @!##”更改为正常的名称,它会起作用吗? – Reynevan