如何使这个结构更智能

Question

我有这个结构是一个类的一部分。

public struct PartStruct 
    { 
     public string name; 
     public string filename; 
     public string layer2D; 
     public string layer3D; 
     public TypeOfPart type; 
     public int hight; 
     public int depth; 
     public int length; 
     public int flooroffset; 
     public int width; 
     public int cellingoffset; 
    } 

这个结构将代表具有不同性质的部分的每一个实例，我使用的只是一个结构类型，因为我有这样的功能：

public void insert(Partstruct part){//large code to insert the part} 

例如：

Partstruct monitor = new Partstruct(); 
monitor.name = "mon1"; 
monitor.file = "default monitor file name.jpg";//this is a const for each new monitor 
monitor.TypeofPart = monitor; 
monitor.layer2d = "default monitor layer";//this will be the same for each new monitor. 

Partstruct keyboard= new Partstruct(); 
keyboard.name = "keyboard1"; 
keyboard.file = "default keyboard file name.jpg";//this is a const for each new keyboard 
keyboard.TypeofPart = keyboard; 
keyboard.layer2d = "default keyboard 2d layer";//this will be the same for each new keyboard. 
keyboard.layer3d = "default keyboard 3d layer"//this will be the same for each new keyboard. 

等。

insert(monitor); 
insert(keyboard); 

我可以用更聪明的方式做到这一点吗？我正在使用.net 3.5

Answer 1

它在我看来像你可以受益于在这种情况下的一些继承。由于部分是一般类型，并且您有更多特定类型，例如监视器和键盘，因此它是继承的最佳示例。因此，这将是这个样子：

public class Part 
{ 
    public virtual string Name { get { return "not specified"; } } 
    public virtual string FileName { get { return "not specified"; } } 
    public virtual string Layer2D { get { return "not specified"; } } 
    public virtual string Layer3D { get { return "not specified"; } } 
    ... 
} 

public class Monitor : Part 
{ 
    public override FileName { get { return "default monitor"; } } 
    public override Layer2D { get { return "default monitor layer"; }} 
    ... 
} 

和

public class Keyboard : Part 
{ 
    public override FileName { get { return "default keyboard filename.jpg"; } } 
    public override Layer2D { get { return "default keyboard 2d layer"; }} 
    ... 
} 

你会发现大量的资源在那里的继承，我会强烈建议在看他们，因为他们会显著提高你的生产力和有效性。下面是一个例子：http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173149(v=vs.80).aspx