2009-09-23 25 views
4

我最近分手我的查询到4个命名的范围,以便更容易重新排序和分页,否则始终正常工作现在有问题计算页数。将分类错误与指定的范围

named_scope :loc, lambda { |id| { :conditions => ['location_id = ?', id ] } } 
    named_scope :datem, lambda { |*args| { :joins => :scannables, :conditions => [ "scannables.bookdate BETWEEN ? and ?", (args[0].to_date || 3.days.from_now), (args[0].to_date+(args[1] || 3)) ], :group => 'scannables.hostel_id', :having => 'SUM(scannables.available) > ' + ((args[1] || 3).to_i-1).to_s } } 
    named_scope :order_by_external_desc, :include => :external_ratings, :order => 'SUM(scannables.available) DESC, external_ratings.rating DESC' 
    named_scope :order_by_external_asc, :include => :external_ratings, :order => 'SUM(scannables.available) DESC, external_ratings.rating ASC' 

使用像这样用PAGINATE扔在年底...

@location = Place.loc(params[:id]).datem(user_cart.getDate,user_cart.getDays).order_by_external_desc.paginate(:per_page => 15, :page => params[:page]) 

PAGINATE例如将表明,有6页的各15,但是当你到了4页,5页6消失......如果你尝试直接跳到5或6,他们就不存在。

看着它,我实现了问题将分页是具有是

[email protected] = Place.loc(params[:id]).datem(user_cart.getDate,user_cart.getDays).order_by_external_desc.size 

c = 78 

然而

[email protected] = Place.loc(params[:id]).datem(user_cart.getDate,user_cart.getDays).order_by_external_desc 

c.size = 56 

对于前者得到生成的SQL是比后者的短约8行并忽略我的SQL HAVING子句,导致它返回更多结果...

有关如何解决此问题的任何想法?

+1

瞎猜:它有助于在'.paginate'之前添加'.all'吗? – tsherif 2012-04-07 15:57:34

+0

你有答案吗? – Joerg 2012-05-02 13:24:43

回答

0

当使用group_by/having时 - 就像你在datem中做的那样named_scope - 不幸的是ActiveRecord的计数错误。我不认为你能做些什么。我也不确定这是否肯定是ActiveRecord中的一个错误 - 或者只是一个在生成SQL的性质使用ActiveRecord时无法正确计算的东西。

无论哪种方式 - 你需要解决这个'错误'。

做到这一点的方法是解决在一个单独的SQL语句中的计数(就是那个给你正确的结果),并将其添加到PAGINATE结果像这样:

total_entries = Place.count(sql) # or the combinations of named_scopes etc with a .size or whichever one gives you the correct count 

Place.scopes.paginate(:per_page => 15, :page => params[:page], :total_entries => total_entries) # where scopes are all of your named scopes as you have in your examples