在Linux平台上我想用2个进程间共享插座后一个停止接收消息。其中一个进程在套接字上发送数据,另一个接收数据。我读了这个网站(here),这是通过设置选项SO_REUSEADDR和/或SO_REUSEPORT完成。两个进程共享UDP套接字,正在重新启动
所以我设置测试方案与3个流程:
1)结合到本地主机侦听上127.0.0.1:44000消息的回声服务器。当它收到一条消息时立即回复发件人;
2)绑定到127.0.01:44001的发件人并向回显服务器发出周期性消息;
3)绑定到127.0.01:44001的接收器并侦听来自回显服务器的消息;
问题:Receiver停止接收回应服务器的回复。这取决于使用的插座选项:
使用SO_REUSEADDR: 如果发送方(2)在接收方(3)之后启动,则后者不会收到任何内容。如果接收器上次启动,但发件人重新启动,再次接收器停止接收。
随着SO_REUSEPORT(或SO_REUSEADDR一起): 的情况正好相反 - 接收器必须首先启动的东西的工作,如发件人最后,你可以重新启动发件人开始多次,只要你想,一切都会工作得很好。但是,如果您重新启动发件人(或只是最后一次启动),它将不会收到任何消息。
这是我使用的代码:
#define CC_LISTEN_PORT 44000
#define DRN_LISTEN_PORT 44001
static void runCC_EchoMode(struct sockaddr_in* ccaddr)
{
char buf[100];
int s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
struct sockaddr_in remaddr;
int recvlen, sentlen;
// bind
if(bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)ccaddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) < 0)
{
debug("%s: bind failed", __func__);
return;
}
/* now loop, receiving data and printing what we received */
unsigned int addrlen = sizeof(remaddr);
int count = 0;
for (;;) {
debug("waiting on port %d\n", ntohs(ccaddr->sin_port));
recvlen = recvfrom(s, buf, sizeof(buf), 0, (struct sockaddr *)&remaddr, &addrlen);
debug("received %d bytes\n", recvlen);
if (recvlen > 0) {
buf[recvlen] = 0;
printf("received message: \"%s\"\n", buf);
// send echo back
sprintf(buf, "Echo #%d", count++);
sentlen = sendto(s, buf, strlen(buf), 0, (struct sockaddr *)&remaddr, sizeof(remaddr));
debug("sent %d bytes to %s:%d\n", sentlen,
inet_ntoa(remaddr.sin_addr), ntohs(remaddr.sin_port));
}
}
close(s);
}
static void runDrn_SendMode(struct sockaddr_in* ccaddr, struct sockaddr_in* drnaddr)
{
char buf[100];
int s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
int sentlen;
int one = 1;
if (setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &one, sizeof(int)) < 0) {
debug("setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR) failed\n");
}
if (setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT, &one, sizeof(int)) < 0) {
debug("setsockopt(SO_REUSEPORT) failed\n");
}
// bind
if(bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)drnaddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) < 0)
{
debug("%s: bind failed", __func__);
return;
}
int count = 0;
for (;;) {
sleep(2);
sprintf(buf, "Hello #%d", count++);
debug("sending \"%s\" to server...\n", buf);
sentlen = sendto(s, buf, strlen(buf), 0, (struct sockaddr *)ccaddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in));
debug("sent %d bytes\n", sentlen);
}
close(s);
}
static void runDrn_RcvMode(struct sockaddr_in* ccaddr, struct sockaddr_in* drnaddr)
{
char buf[100];
int s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
struct sockaddr_in remaddr;
int recvlen;
int one = 1;
if (setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &one, sizeof(int)) < 0) {
debug("setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR) failed\n");
}
if (setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT, &one, sizeof(int)) < 0) {
debug("setsockopt(SO_REUSEPORT) failed\n");
}
// bind
if(bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)drnaddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) < 0)
{
debug("%s: bind failed", __func__);
return;
}
/* now loop, receiving data and printing what we received */
unsigned int addrlen = sizeof(remaddr);
for (;;) {
debug("waiting on port %d\n", ntohs(drnaddr->sin_port));
recvlen = recvfrom(s, buf, sizeof(buf), 0, (struct sockaddr *)&remaddr, &addrlen);
debug("received %d bytes\n", recvlen);
if (recvlen > 0) {
buf[recvlen] = 0;
printf("received message: \"%s\"\n", buf);
}
}
close(s);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int mode;
if (argc < 3) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <host> <mode>\n", argv[0]);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
printf("Starting process with PID: %d\n", getpid());
// this is a simple wrapper of getaddrinfo()
AddressResolver resv1(argv[1]);
resv1.print();
struct sockaddr_in ccaddr, drnaddr;
ccaddr = *(resv1.getAddress(0));
ccaddr.sin_port = htons(CC_LISTEN_PORT);
drnaddr = *(resv1.getAddress(0));
drnaddr.sin_port = htons(DRN_LISTEN_PORT);
mode = atoi(argv[2]);
switch(mode) {
case 0: // cc
runCC_EchoMode(&ccaddr);
break;
case 1: // drone sender
runDrn_SendMode(&ccaddr, &drnaddr);
break;
case 2: // drone receiver
runDrn_RcvMode(&ccaddr, &drnaddr);
break;
default:
debug("Mode is not available\n");
break;
}
return 0;
}
而且我这是怎么开始的3个进程:
./testUDP localhost 0
./testUDP localhost 1
./testUDP localhost 2
这是一个测试运行的输出:
./testUDP localhost 0
Starting process with PID: 10651
IP: 127.0.0.1
waiting on port 44000
received 8 bytes
received message: "Hello #0"
sent 7 bytes to 127.0.0.1:44001
waiting on port 44000
received 8 bytes
received message: "Hello #1"
sent 7 bytes to 127.0.0.1:44001
waiting on port 44000
received 8 bytes
received message: "Hello #2"
sent 7 bytes to 127.0.0.1:44001
waiting on port 44000
^C
...
./testUDP localhost 1
Starting process with PID: 10655
IP: 127.0.0.1
sending "Hello #0" to server...
sent 8 bytes
sending "Hello #1" to server...
sent 8 bytes
sending "Hello #2" to server...
sent 8 bytes
^C
...
./testUDP localhost 2
Starting process with PID: 10652
IP: 127.0.0.1
waiting on port 44001
received 7 bytes
received message: "Echo #0"
waiting on port 44001
received 7 bytes
received message: "Echo #1"
waiting on port 44001
received 7 bytes
received message: "Echo #2"
waiting on port 44001
^C
您没有正确使用SO_REUSE *选项,它们不是针对您正在尝试执行的操作而设计的。 – SergeyA
好的,除了所有的说法,我仍然无法找到差异,仍然没有指定它们中的任何一个导致第二个进程(发送者或接收者)不会通过bind()调用。这就是为什么我不得不在任何情况下使用它们中的任何一种,我想打开相同的IP:端口。 – shondll