1
我试图变得更容易与指针。所以,为了好玩,我采取了以下C++函数,围绕分隔值指针指针:分区链接列表
void partitionList(lnode<int> *& head, int val) {
lnode<int> * front = nullptr;
lnode<int> * back = nullptr;
lnode<int> * curr = head;
while (curr) {
lnode<int> * next = curr->next;
if (curr->data < val) {
curr->next = front;
front = curr;
} else {
curr->next = back;
back = curr;
}
curr = next;
}
curr = front;
while (curr->next) {
curr = curr->next;
}
curr->next = back;
head = front;
}
一个链表,我试图改变它采取C风格的双指针来代替。我做了一个无意识的发现替换,这没有奏效。寻找到它,我发现我的问题的根源,但我还是真的不明白这是怎么回事...
void partitionList(lnode<int> ** head, int val) {
lnode<int> * front = nullptr;
lnode<int> * back = nullptr;
lnode<int> ** curr = head;
while (*curr) {
lnode<int> * entry = *curr;
std::cout << (*curr)->data << std::endl; // On second loop, prints 2
std::cout << entry->data << std::endl; // On second loop, prints 2
lnode<int> * next = entry->next; // This assignment does something
std::cout << entry->data << std::endl; // On second loop, prints 2
std::cout << (*curr)->data << std::endl; // On second loop, prints 3!
if ((*curr)->data < val) {
(*curr)->next = front;
front = *curr;
} else {
(*curr)->next = back;
back = *curr;
}
curr = &next;
}
*curr = front;
while ((*curr)->next) {
(*curr) = (*curr)->next;
}
(*curr)->next = back;
head = &front;
}
int main() {
lnode<int> * tail = new lnode<int>(8, nullptr);
lnode<int> * seven = new lnode<int>(7, tail);
lnode<int> * six = new lnode<int>(6, seven);
lnode<int> * five = new lnode<int>(5, six);
lnode<int> * four = new lnode<int>(4, five);
lnode<int> * three = new lnode<int>(3, four);
lnode<int> * two = new lnode<int>(2, three);
lnode<int> * head = new lnode<int>(1, two);
partitionList(&head, 6);
}
在第一循环中,调试打印线的所有四个附近的顶部函数的while循环打印“1”。但是,在第二个循环中,它们打印“2”,“2”,“2”,“3”?
任何人都可以解释发生了什么?什么是使用双指针而不是对指针的引用的正确方法?
谢谢!
这是有道理的,但我仍然不明白打印输出发生了什么。为什么要这样做改变'(* curr) - > data'的值而不是'entry-> data'?为什么要这样做 'lnode * next = entry-> next;' –
piyo
2013-05-14 15:49:07
因此:curr = &next;这里“curr”变量得到局部变量“next”和next = entry-> next的地址;将修改curr。所以用* curr = next替换curr = &next;; – 2013-05-14 16:16:57
啊,现在我想我明白了。我明白了,我明白了。谢谢! – piyo 2013-05-17 14:32:09