2014-02-10 55 views
2

Ruby中是否有创建一个元素的数组,的同一类型?Ruby:单元素类型的数组

例:

class User 
end 

my_array = UserArray.new 

我当然可以手动创建类,但我宁愿有一个默认的行为,因为我需要它为许多不同的类。

感谢

+0

你为什么需要这门课?为什么不'my_array = []','my_array << User.new'? – falsetru

+2

@falsetru我想,他想限制数组使用特定的元素,如集合... –

+0

如果你想要类似Java中的泛型,Ruby不支持这一点。你需要自己实现它。 – plu

回答

1

你是什么意思?简单地?喜欢这个?

class User; end 
my_array = 5.times.map { User.new } 

或者必须?喜欢这个?

class << Array 
    def of klass_in_plural 
    require 'active_support/inflector' # gem install activesupport if necessary 
    klass = const_get klass_in_plural.to_s.singularize 
    Class.new self do 
     define_method :check do 
     require 'y_support/typing'  # gem install y_support if necessary 
     aT_all_kind_of klass    # runtime assertion that raises TypeError unless 
     end         # all the elements of self are #kind_of? klass 

     class << self 
     def [] *args; super.check end 
     def new *args; super.check end 
     end 

     def << arg; super.check end 
     def + arg; self.class.new super end 
     def - arg; self.class.new super end 
     # etc etc 
    end 
    end 
end 

a = Array.of(:Integers)[ 1, 2, 3 ] 
#=> [ 1, 2, 3 ] 
b = Array.of(:Integers)[ 1, 2, 3.3 ] 
#=> TypeError: Each collection element must be kind of Integer! 
c = Array.of(:Hashes)[ { a: 42 } ] 
#=> [{a: 42}] 
d = Array.of(:Hashes)[ 42 ] 
#=> TypeError: Each collection element must be kind of Hash! 
e = Array.of(:Users)[ User.new, User.new ] 
#=> [#<User:0xb7cd8040>, #<User:0xb7cdaa0c>] 
+1

@Jeffery,我的代码的第二部分有点棘手,我必须在发布之前对它进行测试。 –

+0

是的,你称之为“第一部分”真的是一个评论。 – Shoe

+1

'Array.new(3,“12”)'会创建一个3''12“'对象的数组,它们会将相同的对象保持不变?这不可能是答案,为什么更多的代码?或者可能是我没有得到OP的重点。 –

1

我会多加一个答案,一个不解决字面OP的问题,但解决了提问者可能有问题。 User类型的主要类通常将其实例保存在某种民事登记中。也就是说,对象空间中存在一个或多个集合,其中包含用户名称和其他可能的ID,这些集合都可以用于唯一标识User实例。然后,我们担心验证对象是否是用户或用户标识。这种情况经常遇到,至少对于命名部分,我写了一个宝石,y_support/name_magic。这个gem的灵感来自于Ruby中的类和模块经常被命名,它们可以通过不断的赋值来命名,甚至还有内置的#name方法返回它们的名字。与gem install y_support安装name_magic和按如下方式使用它:

require 'y_support/name_magic' 

class User 
    include NameMagic 
    def to_s; "user #{name or object_id}" end 
    def inspect; "#<#{self}>" end 
end 

# we can now construct named users easily: 
u = User.new name: "Cathy" 
u.name #=> :Cathy 
User::Cathy #=> #<user Cathy> 
# and we also have constant magic at our disposal to construct named users: 
Fred = User.new #=> #<user Fred> 
# By including NameMagic, User class has acquired the registry of instances: 
User.instances #=> [#<user Cathy>, #<user Fred>] 
# And the ability to indifferently access those instances by their ids: 
User.instance(u) #=> #<user Cathy> 
User.instance(:Cathy) #=> #<user Cathy> 
User.instance("Fred") #=> #<user Fred> 
User.instance(:Augustin) #=> NameError: No instance Augustin in User. 
# Anonymous users can be constructed, too: 
u = User.new 
# And named later 
u.name = "Joe" 
# We can notice that although user "Cathy" is no longer explicitly assigned 
# to any variable (since u contains Joe now), it is still registered in the 
# @instances instance variable owned by User class and serviced by NameMagic 
# mixin. So Cathy continues to live as a User instance: 
User.instances #=> [#<user Cathy>, #<user Fred>, #<user Joe>] 
# If we wanted Cathy garbage collected, we would have to forget her explicitly 
User.forget :Cathy # returns the unnamed user Cathy for the last time 
User::Cathy #=> NameError: uninitialized constant User::Cathy 

而在这一点上,我通常定义构造#User这样我就不必键入“.new”一遍又一遍:

def User *args, &block 
    User.new *args, &block 
end 

而且实例访问#user,这样我就不必键入“User.instance”一遍又一遍:

def user user 
    User.instance user 
end 

之后,我有能力处理的情况下识别和验证类的问题:

# Constructing new users: 
User name: "Augustin" #=> #<user Augustin> 
Quentin = User() #=> #<user Quentin> 
#() is necessary to distinguish the method #User from the constant User 

user :Quentin #=> #<user Quentin> 
user :Arun #=> NameError: No instance Arun in User. 

# I will subclass Array to define an array of users: 
class Users < Array 
    class << self 
    def [] *args; super *args.map { |arg| user arg } end 
    def new arg; super arg.map { |e| user e } end 
    end 
end 

# And I will define conveninece constructors #Users and #users: 
def Users arg; Users.new arg end 
def users *args; Users[ *args ] end 

# Now I have indifferent access regardless whether the elements are instances or 
# instance ids (ie. names): 
Users [ Fred, :Augustin ] #=> [#<user Fred>, #<user Augustin>] 
# And I validate that the collection elements must be User instances or their ids: 
users :Augustin, :Quentin #=> [#<user Augustin>, #<user Quentin>] 
users :Augustin, :Arun # NameError: No instance Arun in User. 

要完成的游,让我们回顾一下我们所创建的实例,并且注意到也name_magic定义的方法Array#names

users = User.instances 
#=> [#<user Fred>, #<user Joe>, #<user Augustin>, #<user Quentin>] 

user_names = users.names 
#=> [:Fred, :Joe, :Augustin, :Quentin]