我有一个SMTP服务器,为了这个问题的目的让我们叫它:smtp.mydomain.com。如何检查smtp是否从命令行工作(Linux)
如何检查SMTP服务器是否在工作?我可以从Linux命令行发送电子邮件吗?
我有一个SMTP服务器,为了这个问题的目的让我们叫它:smtp.mydomain.com。如何检查smtp是否从命令行工作(Linux)
如何检查SMTP服务器是否在工作?我可以从Linux命令行发送电子邮件吗?
远程登录到您的SMTP服务器一样
telnet smtp.mydomain.com 25
语法:
telnet {smtp_domain_name} {port_number}
复制并粘贴以下
helo your_domain.com
mail from:<[email protected]_domain.com>
rcpt to:<[email protected]_domain.com>
data
From: [email protected]_domain.com
Subject: test mail from command line
this is test number 1
sent from linux box
.
注: “”不要忘了在代表消息结束的末尾
我在网络上发现了这个,并将其添加到堆栈溢出,因为许多事情最终都在这里。
[[email protected] tmp]# mail -v [email protected]
Subject: Test
Hello world
Cc: <Ctrl+D>
[email protected] Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
220 piwik-dev.example.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.8; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:49:40 -0400
>>> EHLO piwik-dev.example.com
250-piwik-dev.example.com Hello localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE
250-DSN
250-ETRN
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP
>>> MAIL From:<[email protected]> SIZE=46
250 2.1.0 <[email protected]>... Sender ok
>>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
>>> DATA
250 2.1.5 <[email protected]>... Recipient ok
354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
>>> .
250 2.0.0 q7NEneju002633 Message accepted for delivery
[email protected] Sent (q7NEneju002633 Message accepted for delivery)
Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
>>> QUIT
221 2.0.0 piwik-dev.example.com closing connection
不知道这是否有帮助,但这是一个命令行工具,它可以让您简单地从SMTP服务器发送测试邮件。 http://code.google.com/p/woodpecker-tester/
关于使用telnet测试postfix或其他SMTP的唯一方法是必须知道命令和语法。相反,只需使用swaks :)
[email protected]:~$
[email protected]:~$ mail -f Maildir
"/home/thufir/Maildir": 4 messages
> 1 [email protected] 15/553 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:15:12 -0800
2 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:15:55 -0800
3 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:29:57 -0800
4 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:54:16 -0800
? q
Held 4 messages in /home/thufir/Maildir
[email protected]:~$
[email protected]:~$ swaks --to [email protected]
=== Trying dur.bounceme.net:25...
=== Connected to dur.bounceme.net.
<- 220 dur.bounceme.net ESMTP Postfix (Ubuntu)
-> EHLO dur.bounceme.net
<- 250-dur.bounceme.net
<- 250-PIPELINING
<- 250-SIZE 10240000
<- 250-VRFY
<- 250-ETRN
<- 250-STARTTLS
<- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
<- 250-8BITMIME
<- 250 DSN
-> MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
<- 250 2.1.0 Ok
-> RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
<- 250 2.1.5 Ok
-> DATA
<- 354 End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
-> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:33:17 -0800
-> To: [email protected]
-> From: [email protected]
-> Subject: test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:33:17 -0800
-> X-Mailer: swaks v20130209.0 jetmore.org/john/code/swaks/
->
-> This is a test mailing
->
-> .
<- 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 52D162C3EFF
-> QUIT
<- 221 2.0.0 Bye
=== Connection closed with remote host.
[email protected]:~$
[email protected]:~$ mail -f Maildir
"/home/thufir/Maildir": 5 messages 1 new
1 [email protected] 15/553 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:15:12 -0800
2 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:15:55 -0800
3 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:29:57 -0800
4 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:54:16 -0800
>N 5 [email protected] 15/581 test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:33:17 -0800
? 5
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from dur.bounceme.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dur.bounceme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D162C3EFF
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:33:17 -0800
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: test Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:33:17 -0800
X-Mailer: swaks v20130209.0 jetmore.org/john/code/swaks/
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
This is a test mailing
New mail has arrived.
? q
Held 5 messages in /home/thufir/Maildir
[email protected]:~$
这只是一个简单的命令。
我不知道swaks。谢谢! – 2015-01-14 19:28:57
@Flexo这些问题不应该迁移而不是关闭吗?这看起来像属于Serverfault – Balmipour 2015-10-15 19:10:25
@Balmipour旧问题无法迁移,即使是版主。在http://meta.stackexchange.com上讨论这个问题有很好的理由(我现在没有链接),但请注意,问题不会被删除。 – Flexo 2015-10-15 19:25:24
在Meta上检查了几篇文章后,似乎(对我)迁移“刚”需要先重新打开。也许这对老问题是不可能的,顺便说一句。我想你比我更了解这一点。无论如何,谢谢你的回答。 我在meta帖子中读到的一个更相关的观点是迁移似乎需要一个“特别有价值”的问题。并不是说这个是无用的,但它也不是一颗宝石。 我不明白这一点,因为SO被其他网站如ServerFault/Linux或超级用户所高估,但我会继续辩论另一天(它也属于Meta,不是这样:) – Balmipour 2015-10-16 14:20:15