在Ruby:什么是 “对” 的红宝石
for i in A do
# some code
end
是一样的:
A.each do |i|
# some code
end
for
不是核方法:
- 到底是“
for
什么“在红宝石 - 有没有办法使用其他关键字做类似的事情?
是这样的:
total = sum i in I {x[i]}
映射到:
total = I.sum {|i] x[i]}
在Ruby:什么是 “对” 的红宝石
for i in A do
# some code
end
是一样的:
A.each do |i|
# some code
end
for
不是核方法:
for
什么“在红宝石是这样的:
total = sum i in I {x[i]}
映射到:
total = I.sum {|i] x[i]}
这几乎是语法糖。一个区别是,虽然for
将使用它的代码范围,但each
会在其块中创建一个单独的作用域。比较以下几点:
for i in (1..3)
x = i
end
p x # => 3
与
(1..3).each do |i|
x = i
end
p x # => undefined local variable or method `x' for main:Object
for
是用于each
方法只是语法糖。这可以通过运行该代码可以看出:
for i in 1 do
end
这将导致错误:
NoMethodError: undefined method `each' for 1:Fixnum
-1因为两者之间的区别,他们并不总是等同。 – user2398029 2012-12-10 00:29:12
对于只是语法糖。
For ... In
Earlier we said that the only built-in Ruby looping primitives were while and until. What's this ``for'' thing, then? Well, for is almost a lump of syntactic sugar. When you write
for aSong in songList aSong.play end
Ruby translates it into something like:
songList.each do |aSong| aSong.play end
The only difference between the for loop and the each form is the scope of local variables that are defined in the body. This is discussed on page 87.
You can use for to iterate over any object that responds to the method each, such as an Array or a Range.
for i in ['fee', 'fi', 'fo', 'fum'] print i, " " end for i in 1..3 print i, " " end for i in File.open("ordinal").find_all { |l| l =~ /d$/} print i.chomp, " " end
produces:
fee fi fo fum 1 2 3 second third
As long as your class defines a sensible each method, you can use a for loop to traverse it.
class Periods def each yield "Classical" yield "Jazz" yield "Rock" end end periods = Periods.new for genre in periods print genre, " " end
produces:
Classical Jazz Rock
Ruby没有对列表内涵其他关键字(如您在上面所做的总和例子)。 for
不是一个非常受欢迎的关键字,并且方法语法(arr.each {}
)通常是首选。
哇,这么微妙,但当我遇到这样的事情时会变得方便。谢谢! – sivabudh 2011-10-08 02:20:50