我在写一些ruby(不是Rails),并且用shoulda来测试/测试单元。有没有好的ruby测试追踪解决方案?
是否有任何宝石可以让我实现从测试到设计/需求的可追溯性?
即:我想与他们测试的要求,名称标记我的测试,然后生成的未测试的要求,报告或有失败的测试等
希望这不是为红宝石太enterprisey 。
谢谢!
我在写一些ruby(不是Rails),并且用shoulda来测试/测试单元。有没有好的ruby测试追踪解决方案?
是否有任何宝石可以让我实现从测试到设计/需求的可追溯性?
即:我想与他们测试的要求,名称标记我的测试,然后生成的未测试的要求,报告或有失败的测试等
希望这不是为红宝石太enterprisey 。
谢谢!
更新:该解决方案可作为宝石:http://rubygems.org/gems/test4requirements
是否有任何宝石是是否允许我实现从我的 测试回溯到设计/要求的可追溯性?
我不知道任何宝石,但你的需要是一个小实验的灵感,它是如何解决的。
而现在的例子:
gem 'test-unit'
require 'test/unit'
###########
# This should be a gem
###########
class Test::Unit::TestCase
def self.requirements(req)
@@requirements = req
end
def requirement(req)
raise RuntimeError, "No requirements defined for #{self}" unless defined? @@requirements
caller.first =~ /:\d+:in `(.*)'/
@@requirements.add_test(req, "#{self.class}##{$1}")
end
alias :run_test_old :run_test
def run_test
run_test_old
#this code is left if a problem occured.
#in other words: if we reach this place, then the test was sucesfull
if defined? @@requirements
@@requirements.test_successfull("#{self.class}##{@method_name}")
end
end
end
class RequirementList
def initialize(*reqs)
@requirements = reqs
@tests = {}
@success = {}
#Yes, we need two at_exit.
#tests are done also at_exit. With double at_exit, we are after that.
#Maybe better to be added later.
at_exit {
at_exit do
self.overview
end
}
end
def add_test(key, loc)
#fixme check duplicates
@tests[key] = loc
end
def test_successfull(loc)
#fixme check duplicates
@success[loc] = true
end
def overview()
puts "Requirements overiew"
@requirements.each{|req|
if @tests[req] #test defined
if @success[@tests[req]]
puts "Requirement #{req} was tested in #{@tests[req] }"
else
puts "Requirement #{req} was unsuccessfull tested in #{@tests[req] }"
end
else
puts "Requirement #{req} was not tested"
end
}
end
end #RequirementList
###############
## Here the gem end. The test will come.
###############
$req = RequirementList.new(1,2,3, 4)
class MyTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
#Following requirements exist, and must be tested sucessfull
requirements $req
def test_1()
requirement(1) #this test is testing requirement 1
assert_equal(2,1+1)
end
def test_2()
requirement(2)
assert_equal(3,1+1)
end
def test_3()
#no assignment to requirement 3
pend 'pend'
end
end
class MyTest_4 < Test::Unit::TestCase
#Following requirements exist, and must be tested sucessfull
requirements $req
def test_4()
requirement(4) #this test is testing requirement 4
assert_equal(2,1+1)
end
end
结果:
Loaded suite testing_traceability_solutions
Started
.FP.
1) Failure:
test_2(MyTest)
[testing_traceability_solutions.rb:89:in `test_2'
testing_traceability_solutions.rb:24:in `run_test']:
<3> expected but was
<2>.
2) Pending: pend
test_3(MyTest)
testing_traceability_solutions.rb:92:in `test_3'
testing_traceability_solutions.rb:24:in `run_test'
Finished in 0.65625 seconds.
4 tests, 3 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 1 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
50% passed
Requirements overview:
Requirement 1 was tested in MyTest#test_1
Requirement 2 was unsuccessfull tested in MyTest#test_2
Requirement 3 was not tested
Requirement 4 was tested in MyTest_4#test_4
如果你认为,这可能是一个解决方案给你,请给我一个反馈。然后我会尝试从它身上创建一个宝石。
代码示例使用与早该
#~ require 'test4requirements' ###does not exist/use code above
require 'shoulda'
#use another interface ##not implemented###
#~ $req = Requirement.new_from_file('requirments.txt')
class MyTest_shoulda < Test::Unit::TestCase
#Following requirements exist, and must be tested sucessfull
#~ requirements $req
context 'req. of customer X' do
#Add requirement as parameter of should
# does not work yet
should 'fullfill request 1', requirement: 1 do
assert_equal(2,1+1)
end
#add requirement via requirement command
#works already
should 'fullfill request 1' do
requirement(1) #this test is testing requirement 1
assert_equal(2,1+1)
end
end #context
end #MyTest_shoulda
随着cucumber你可以有你的要求是测试,没有得到任何比这更可追踪:)
所以一个要求是功能,和功能有要测试场景。
# addition.feature
Feature: Addition
In order to avoid silly mistakes
As a math idiot
I want to be told the sum of two numbers
Scenario Outline: Add two numbers
Given I have entered <input_1> into the calculator
And I have entered <input_2> into the calculator
When I press <button>
Then the result should be <output> on the screen
Examples:
| input_1 | input_2 | button | output |
| 20 | 30 | add | 50 |
| 2 | 5 | add | 7 |
| 0 | 40 | add | 40 |
那么你已经使用Ruby编写的步骤定义映射到场景
# step_definitons/calculator_steps.rb
begin require 'rspec/expectations'; rescue LoadError; require 'spec/expectations'; end
require 'cucumber/formatter/unicode'
$:.unshift(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../../lib')
require 'calculator'
Before do
@calc = Calculator.new
end
After do
end
Given /I have entered (\d+) into the calculator/ do |n|
@calc.push n.to_i
end
When /I press (\w+)/ do |op|
@result = @calc.send op
end
Then /the result should be (.*) on the screen/ do |result|
@result.should == result.to_f
end
这看起来很漂亮,但我不知道它会为我工作。例如,我的一个测试检查一个方法的返回值,该方法是一个包含150个元素的3D数组。我如何在黄瓜中做到这一点? (我已经写在测试/单元中。) –
这看起来像个好主意 - 我正在考虑以不同的方式滚动自己。我的reqs在一个txt文件中,每个文件都有一个标签[REQnnnn]。然后,我将这个标签添加到每个测试中的“应该”行(我正在使用shoulda)。我最后一步是编写一个运行单元测试的TestRunner类,抓取输出并对照需求txt文件进行交叉检查。感谢您的灵感。 –
我刚刚添加了与shoulda一起使用的代码示例。你觉得那样吗? Requirement#new_by_file将读取一个包含需求的文本文件。你有特殊的格式吗?我会推荐一个yaml文件。 – knut
此代码作为宝石的预发布版本可在http://rubygems.org/gems/test4requirements – knut