是否可以克隆有多个修订版本的git仓库?我们试图做到这一点,并在第1000次提交后执行GC并退出,使克隆处于不可用状态。git-svn问题
r998 = a5cb4f6a377b0ca80cd95d73b0e32f0552b9cdfd (git-svn)
M trunk/asdf/asdf.java
r999 = a87b06ae8aa497bb28c294b7ff8668ce2e4c8fcc (git-svn)
D tags/sdafasdf/asdfasdf.java
r1000 = 20b383d138499eee4f121079ae059458f3facc94 (git-svn)
Auto packing your repository for optimum performance. You may also
run "git gc" manually. See "git help gc" for more information.
Counting objects: 18103, done.
Compressing objects: 61% (10590/17116) 7116)
Compressing objects: 100% (17116/17116), done.
Writing objects: 100% (18103/18103), done.
Total 18103 (delta 9301), reused 0 (delta 0)
Removing duplicate objects: 100% (256/256), done.
[email protected]:~#
试图通过键入命令继续结账再次导致以下:
[email protected]:~/repo# git svn clone https://host/svn/repo
Remote ref refs/remote/git-svn is tracked by
"svn-remote.svn.fetch=:refs/remotes/git-svn"
and
"svn-remote.svn.fetch=:refs/remotes/git-svn"
Please resolve this ambiguity in your git configuration file before continuing
我想这是因为你试图重新运行的命令是“svn clone”,它基本上是“svn init”,后面是“svn fetch”。所以我应该说“重新运行git svn fetch”。我有这么多的麻烦,所以我养成了一直习惯初始化然后手工抓取的习惯。 – Lachlan 2009-11-17 06:43:31
我认为你是对的。我不得不质疑git命令将配置文件中的某些内容放入实际上已损坏的情况。如果一个新的git用户意外地输入了错误的命令,它不应该完全破坏版本库。 (除非中断,这是他们试图做的) – corydoras 2009-11-19 22:19:39