2013-06-05 56 views
1

我有一个包含数百万节点和关系的大图。 我需要找出与< = 5个箍之间的所有可能的关系组。 示例: GroupA {Node1,Node2,Node3,... Node100}具有100个节点的节点组。查找节点组之间的所有可能关系

现在我想找到所有这些节点之间的所有可能的关系。

当我运行包含100个节点的Cypher Query时,一切正常,但是当我用101个节点运行它时,我得到了TimeOut。 (所有请求都是REST)

{ 
     "query": "start s = node(114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214), d = node(114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214) match p = s -[r?*0..5]-> d return p ", 
     "params": {} 
    } 

有人可以解释我会发生什么?错误查询?

UPDATE: 另一个问题发现: 当我运行200个的Cypher查询环路,服务器停止后查询号码100

Something like that 
for (i=0; i<200; i++) 
{ 
    query = "start s = node(" + sourceNodeId + "), d = node(" + destinationNodeid + ") match p = s -[r?*0.." + deep + "]-> d return p" 
    RunCypherQuery(query); 
} 

回应可能会导致什么为这种奇怪的行为? 10X

UPDATE:

我进行存储的调整和增加JavaMemory MIN和MAX 4G的,而不是4M和64M 结果是例外:

Error 500 GC overhead limit exceeded 
HTTP ERROR 500 
Problem accessing /db/data/cypher. 
Reason: 
GC overhead limit exceeded</pre></p><h3>Caused by:</h3><pre>java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded 
    at scala.collection.JavaConversions$.mapAsScalaMap(JavaConversions.scala:488) 
    at scala.collection.JavaConverters$$anonfun$mapAsScalaMapConverter$1.apply(JavaConverters.scala:441) 
    at scala.collection.JavaConverters$$anonfun$mapAsScalaMapConverter$1.apply(JavaConverters.scala:441) 
    at scala.collection.JavaConverters$AsScala.asScala(JavaConverters.scala:80) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.MutableMaps$.create(Pipe.scala:60) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.ExecutionContext.newWith(Pipe.scala:136) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.AddedHistory.toMap(History.scala:75) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.isMatchSoFar(PatternMatcher.scala:166) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.org$neo4j$cypher$internal$pipes$matching$PatternMatcher$$traverseNextNodeFromRelationship(PatternMatcher.scala:98) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher$$anonfun$4.apply(PatternMatcher.scala:150) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher$$anonfun$4.apply(PatternMatcher.scala:150) 
    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Stream.scala:175) 
    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Stream.scala:175) 
    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:634) 
    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:626) 
    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.foldLeft(Stream.scala:302) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseRelationship(PatternMatcher.scala:150) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseNextSpecificNode(PatternMatcher.scala:61) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseNode(PatternMatcher.scala:72) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseNextNodeOrYield(PatternMatcher.scala:177) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseNextSpecificNode(PatternMatcher.scala:60) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseNode(PatternMatcher.scala:72) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.foreach(PatternMatcher.scala:36) 
    at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:194) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.map(PatternMatcher.scala:28) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatterMatchingBuilder.org$neo4j$cypher$internal$pipes$matching$PatterMatchingBuilder$$createPatternMatcher(PatterMatchingBuilder.scala:90) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatterMatchingBuilder$$anonfun$getMatches$1.apply(PatterMatchingBuilder.scala:47) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatterMatchingBuilder$$anonfun$getMatches$1.apply(PatterMatchingBuilder.scala:47) 
    at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:200) 
    at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:200) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.yieldThis(PatternMatcher.scala:185) 
    at org.neo4j.cypher.internal.pipes.matching.PatternMatcher.traverseNextNodeOrYield(PatternMatcher.scala:175) 
+1

我执行升级到1.9。然后我删除了内存调整为默认值。在我最后一次尝试中,当A的大小为100个节点和B 1000节点的大小时,我成功地在2组A和B之间执行查询。该查询运行约69042毫秒=> 1分钟9秒。问题仍然存在:为什么我无法使用大于100个节点的源组执行查询。 – Zaber

回答

1

我认为你的问题可能有点不清楚。你想要返回所有连接对的列表?如果是的话,这里有一个暗号查询将返回所有对:

START a=node(*) 
MATCH p=a-[*1..5]->b 
RETURN distinct p 
+0

嗨尼古拉斯,我想找到特定的节点组内的所有对在我的情况下,我有巨大的数百万节点的图,但检查组只包括其中的100个,但节点(*)它都是图 – Zaber

-1

我同意尼古拉斯,你应该尝试使用暗号,您可以通过REST API发送以及(见here)。

尝试

START n=node(1,2,3), m=node(1,2,3) 
MATCH n-[?*..4]->()-[r]->m 
RETURN DISTINCT r; 

当然更换(1,2,3)与您长100个节点ID列表! 这就是你正在寻找的,如果我正确地承诺你!

+0

嗨A Sz,我检查你查询并运行正常,但直到我使用<100元素的组。同样对我的查询也是正确的。当我增加组大小只有1 => 101而不是100时,你会像我一样查询死亡。我真的认为这个服务器有这个问题的一些配置,但我不知道在哪里搜索。 – Zaber

+0

是的,100是将数字舍入为任意随机存储器或类似限制的方式。必须是一些配置。你在哪个版本的'neo4j'上? –

+0

我认为这是最后稳定的Neo4j 1.8。2 – Zaber

相关问题