2017-09-22 52 views
1

我们有这样的功能:终极版 - 传奇单元测试意外失败

export function* postPermitApplicationRequest() { 
    try { 
    const uris = yield select(state => getUris(state)); 

    .... (more yields hereafter) 

我们测试用玩笑和柴此功能如下:

... 
const action = { type: Action.POST_PERMIT_APPLICATION }; 
const generator = postPermitApplicationRequest(action);  

it('must select uris from state',() => { 
    const nextCall = generator.next().value; 
    const uris = select(state => getUris(state)); 
    expect(nextCall).to.deep.equal(uris); 
}); 

然而,预期失败:

AssertionError: expected { Object (@@redux-saga/IO, SELECT) } to deeply equal { Object (@@redux-saga/IO, SELECT) } 

    at Assertion.assertEqual (node_modules/chai/lib/chai/core/assertions.js:485:19) 
    at Assertion.ctx.(anonymous function) [as equal] (node_modules/chai/lib/chai/utils/addMethod.js:41:25) 
    at Object.<anonymous> (src/app/pa/PermitApplicationServiceSagas.test.js:20:43) 
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:109:7) 

这两个物体看起来像:

{ '@@redux-saga/IO': true, 
    SELECT: { selector: [Function], args: [] } } 

但是选择器功能是不同的。一来就是generator.next()的结果中包含的代码覆盖率跳过提示:

function (state) {/* istanbul ignore next */cov_zrpq42gyn.f[12]++;cov_zrpq42gyn.s[19]++;return (/* istanbul ignore next */(0, _Selectors.getUris)(state));} 

,而原来的功能不会:

function (state) {return (0, _Selectors.getUris)(state);} 

它看起来像generator.next()将这些提示和断言失败

我们在这里有什么错?

我们使用终极版,传奇0.14.8

回答

2

测试失败,因为在你的传奇,你的测试,你创建在每次执行代码时,一个新的功能。这两个函数都会被比较,但不是同一个实例。

您可以简单地在您的传奇和测试中使用select(getUris),因为两者都会引用相同的功能。

你的传奇:

export function* postPermitApplicationRequest() { 
    try { 
    const uris = yield select(getUris); 

    .... (more yields hereafter) 

您的测试:

... 
const action = { type: Action.POST_PERMIT_APPLICATION }; 
const generator = postPermitApplicationRequest(action);  

it('must select uris from state',() => { 
    const nextCall = generator.next().value; 
    const uris = select(getUris); 
    expect(nextCall).to.deep.equal(uris); 
}); 
+0

非常感谢,弗洛里安! – Erik