4
我有一个生产数据库复制到另一个主机使用londist。该表看起来像慢sql选择与索引postgres
# \d+ usermessage
Table "public.usermessage"
Column | Type | Modifiers | Description
-------------------+-------------------+-----------+-------------
id | bigint | not null |
subject | character varying | |
message | character varying | |
read | boolean | |
timestamp | bigint | |
owner | bigint | |
sender | bigint | |
recipient | bigint | |
dao_created | bigint | |
dao_updated | bigint | |
type | integer | |
replymessageid | character varying | |
originalmessageid | character varying | |
replied | boolean | |
mheader | boolean | |
mbody | boolean | |
Indexes:
"usermessage_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"usermessage_owner_key" btree (owner)
"usermessage_recipient_key" btree (recipient)
"usermessage_timestamp_key" btree ("timestamp")
"usermessage_type_key" btree (type)
Has OIDs: no
如果复制的数据库上执行,选择快如预期,如果生产主机上执行它的可怕缓慢。为了让事情变得更奇怪,并非所有时间戳都很慢,其中一些主机上的一些速度很快。生产主机后面的文件系统和存储很好,而且使用量不大。有任何想法吗?
replication# explain analyse SELECT COUNT(id) FROM usermessage WHERE owner = 1234567 AND timestamp > 1362077127010;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=263.37..263.38 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.059..0.060 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on usermessage (cost=259.35..263.36 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.055..0.055 rows=0 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((owner = 1234567) AND ("timestamp" > 1362077127010::bigint))
-> BitmapAnd (cost=259.35..259.35 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.054..0.054 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on usermessage_owner_key (cost=0.00..19.27 rows=241 width=0) (actual time=0.032..0.032 rows=33 loops=1)
Index Cond: (owner = 1234567)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on usermessage_timestamp_key (cost=0.00..239.82 rows=12048 width=0) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: ("timestamp" > 1362077127010::bigint)
Total runtime: 0.103 ms
(9 rows)
production# explain analyse SELECT COUNT(id) FROM usermessage WHERE owner = 1234567 AND timestamp > 1362077127010;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=267.39..267.40 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=47536.590..47536.590 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on usermessage (cost=263.37..267.38 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=47532.520..47536.579 rows=3 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((owner = 1234567) AND ("timestamp" > 1362077127010::bigint))
-> BitmapAnd (cost=263.37..263.37 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=47532.334..47532.334 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on usermessage_owner_key (cost=0.00..21.90 rows=168 width=0) (actual time=0.123..0.123 rows=46 loops=1)
Index Cond: (owner = 1234567)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on usermessage_timestamp_key (cost=0.00..241.22 rows=12209 width=0) (actual time=47530.255..47530.255 rows=5255617 loops=1)
Index Cond: ("timestamp" > 1362077127010::bigint)
Total runtime: 47536.668 ms
(9 rows)
您是否尝试过在生产数据库上运行分析? – 2013-03-07 16:07:55
尝试运行SELECT COUNT(timestamp)FROM usermessage WHERE owner = 1234567两个 – 2013-03-07 16:14:11
如果你还没有运行真空,你应该先尝试一下。 – PJLopez 2013-03-07 16:01:47