4
我对Clojure很陌生,我一直在努力实现一些并发代码。我在网上找到了这段代码。有一个警告,它不是在Clojure中进行并发的正确方法,但我仍然想理解此代码。了解这个Clojure代码
(def *readers* (map #(agent %) '("one" "two" "three")))
(def *writers* (map #(agent %) '("four" "five")))
(def *mutex* (agent :unlocked))
(def *value* 0)
; mutex implementation
(defn lock [state who success-fn fail-fn]
(send who (if (= state :locked) fail-fn success-fn))
:locked)
(defn unlock [mutex]
:unlocked)
; Must be invoked with send-off since this handler blocks
(defn rand-sleep [state next-fn]
(Thread/sleep (rand-int 5))
(send *agent* next-fn)
state)
; Reader functions
(declare try-read)
(defn reader-got-lock [name]
(println (format "Thread %s says that the value is %d." name *value*))
(send *mutex* unlock)
(send-off *agent* rand-sleep try-read)
name)
(defn reader-did-not-get-lock [name]
(println (format "Thread %s tried to read the value, but could not." name))
(send-off *agent* rand-sleep try-read)
name)
(defn try-read [name]
(send *mutex* lock *agent* reader-got-lock reader-did-not-get-lock)
name)
; Writer functions
(declare try-write)
(defn writer-got-lock [name]
(println (format "Thread %s is taking the lock." name))
(def *value* (rand-int 10))
(println (format "Thread %s is changing the value to %d." name *value*))
(send *mutex* unlock)
(println (format "Thread %s is relasing the lock." name))
(send-off *agent* rand-sleep try-write)
name)
(defn writer-did-not-get-lock [name]
(println (format "Thread %s tried to write the value, but could not." name))
(send-off *agent* rand-sleep try-write)
name)
(defn try-write [name]
(send *mutex* lock *agent* writer-got-lock writer-did-not-get-lock)
name)
(dorun (map #(send % try-write) *writers*))
(dorun (map #(send % try-read) *readers*))
具体我被困在这条线:
(defn try-write [name]
(send *mutex* lock *agent* writer-got-lock writer-did-not-get-lock)
name)
应该锁定互斥锁,并呼吁无论是作家了锁或作家那样 - 不得到锁取决于互斥州。但是*agent*
在哪里声明,还是访问当前代理的捷径?那么如何将state
传递给锁,在上述情况下是*agent*
还是*agent*
是who
?
什么样的结构作为名称在尝试写或结束时锁定意味着什么?在执行该函数之后它是否将调用者代理设置为此状态? – bvk256