我有一组文档,我想知道每个文档的主题分布(针对不同的主题数量值)。我从this question拿了一个玩具程序。 我首先使用了gensim提供的LDA,然后我再次给出测试数据作为我的训练数据本身,以获得每个doc在训练数据中的主题分布。但我总是得到统一的主题分布。gensim LDA模块:在预测时始终获得统一的主题分布
下面是我用
import gensim
import logging
logging.basicConfig(filename="logfile",format='%(message)s', level=logging.INFO)
def get_doc_topics(lda, bow):
gamma, _ = lda.inference([bow])
topic_dist = gamma[0]/sum(gamma[0]) # normalize distribution
documents = ['Human machine interface for lab abc computer applications',
'A survey of user opinion of computer system response time',
'The EPS user interface management system',
'System and human system engineering testing of EPS',
'Relation of user perceived response time to error measurement',
'The generation of random binary unordered trees',
'The intersection graph of paths in trees',
'Graph minors IV Widths of trees and well quasi ordering',
'Graph minors A survey']
texts = [[word for word in document.lower().split()] for document in documents]
dictionary = gensim.corpora.Dictionary(texts)
id2word = {}
for word in dictionary.token2id:
id2word[dictionary.token2id[word]] = word
mm = [dictionary.doc2bow(text) for text in texts]
lda = gensim.models.ldamodel.LdaModel(corpus=mm, id2word=id2word, num_topics=2, update_every=1, chunksize=10000, passes=1,minimum_probability=0.0)
newdocs=["human system"]
print lda[dictionary.doc2bow(newdocs)]
newdocs=["Human machine interface for lab abc computer applications"] #same as 1st doc in training
print lda[dictionary.doc2bow(newdocs)]
这里的玩具代码输出:
[(0, 0.5), (1, 0.5)]
[(0, 0.5), (1, 0.5)]
我有一些更多的例子检查,但所有最终给出相同的等概率的结果。
这里是产生(即记录器的输出)的日志文件
adding document #0 to Dictionary(0 unique tokens: [])
built Dictionary(42 unique tokens: [u'and', u'minors', u'generation', u'testing', u'iv']...) from 9 documents (total 69 corpus positions)
using symmetric alpha at 0.5
using symmetric eta at 0.5
using serial LDA version on this node
running online LDA training, 2 topics, 1 passes over the supplied corpus of 9 documents, updating model once every 9 documents, evaluating perplexity every 9 documents, iterating 50x with a convergence threshold of 0.001000
too few updates, training might not converge; consider increasing the number of passes or iterations to improve accuracy
-5.796 per-word bound, 55.6 perplexity estimate based on a held-out corpus of 9 documents with 69 words
PROGRESS: pass 0, at document #9/9
topiC#0 (0.500): 0.057*"of" + 0.043*"user" + 0.041*"the" + 0.040*"trees" + 0.039*"interface" + 0.036*"graph" + 0.030*"system" + 0.027*"time" + 0.027*"response" + 0.026*"eps"
topiC#1 (0.500): 0.088*"of" + 0.061*"system" + 0.043*"survey" + 0.040*"a" + 0.036*"graph" + 0.032*"trees" + 0.032*"and" + 0.032*"minors" + 0.031*"the" + 0.029*"computer"
topic diff=0.539396, rho=1.000000
它说,“太少了更新,训练可能不会收敛”这就是我一直提高不传球到1000,但输出仍然相同。 (虽然它与收敛无关,但我也尝试过增加主题)
完美!谢谢 !而且我还需要了解一件事情。我所做的所有这些工作的主要目标,就像问题中提到的那样,是要获得主题的主题分布。有没有更好的方式,我做了LDA之后得到它,用了我在代码中使用的小黑客(它将训练集作为测试集提供!) – MysticForce