2012-12-20 45 views
1

我只是想知道是否有更好的方法来组织这些铁路线路。也许在一个组?我不熟悉这样的最佳实践。更好的方式来组织轨道路线?

TestApp::Application.routes.draw do 
    root :to => 'posts#index' 
    resources :posts, :except => :destroy 
    match '/posts/page/:page' => 'posts#page' 
    match '/posts/delete/:id' => 'posts#delete' 
    match '/posts/undelete/:id' => 'posts#undelete' 
    match '/posts/hide/:id' => 'posts#hide' 
    match '/posts/unhide/:id' => 'posts#unhide' 
    match '/help' => 'help#index' 
end 

回答

2

,你可以将它们在collection块嵌套块内的resources :posts如下

resources :posts, :except => :destroy do 
    collection do 
    match 'page/:page' => 'posts#page' 
    match 'delete/:id' => 'posts#delete' 
    match 'undelete/:id' => 'posts#undelete' 
    match 'hide/:id'  => 'posts#hide' 
    match 'unhide/:id' => 'posts#unhide' 
    end 
end 

这些路线不是很REST风格虽然。我可能会建议类似以下内容

resources :posts, :except => :destroy do 
    member do 
    get 'page/:page' => 'posts#page' 
    delete 'delete'  => 'posts#delete' 
    put 'undelete' => 'posts#undelete' 
    put 'hide'  => 'posts#hide' 
    put 'unhide'  => 'posts#unhide' 
    end 
end 

这会创建更干净的路由,同时仍指向相同的控制器/操作。你不得不修改你的应用程序指向正确的路线有点不同,以支持这种更被接受的行为,虽然。

   GET /posts/:id/page/:page(.:format) posts#page 
    delete_post DELETE /posts/:id/delete(.:format)  posts#delete 
undelete_post PUT /posts/:id/undelete(.:format)  posts#undelete 
    hide_post PUT /posts/:id/hide(.:format)   posts#hide 
    unhide_post PUT /posts/:id/unhide(.:format)  posts#unhide 
     posts GET /posts(.:format)     posts#index 
       POST /posts(.:format)     posts#create 
    new_post GET /posts/new(.:format)    posts#new 
    edit_post GET /posts/:id/edit(.:format)   posts#edit 
     post GET /posts/:id(.:format)    posts#show 
       PUT /posts/:id(.:format)    posts#update 
+0

啊,谢谢!后者正是我所期待的。我唯一的问题是,您修改了删除操作以发送HTTP DELETE,但它实际上并未删除我表中的任何内容,它只修改数据库中的is_deleted列。这仍然没问题,还是应该更改为GET? – bswinnerton

+0

它绝对**不应该是'GET'。我个人认为它是一个'DELETE',因为从用户的角度来看,资源*被删除,但其他人会认为'PUT'更加RESTful。 – deefour