2014-09-26 23 views
0

如何将一个数字随机分成几个数字?如何在红宝石中随机分配一个数字?

例如:我有一个数字30,我想它随机分成几个数字,每个数字的大小为3-10之间,且每个数字的大小是互不相同

结果可能是这样的:[5,7,9,6,3],[9,10,3,8],...等

我试过了,但是我解决不了,请给我帮助。

+2

“随机分成几个数字”是模糊的。你必须准确解释你的意思是“随机”,但我希望你会有一些困难。 – 2014-09-26 01:17:03

+0

@Cary Swoveland,随机,它意味着号码的数字是随机的 – user3673267 2014-09-26 01:31:22

+1

我认为歧义是什么意思是“分裂一个数字”。你是否要求一个随机的数字加起来的原始数字的唯一加号? – 2014-09-26 01:31:54

回答

1

非常不错的拼图。我会去:

class Fixnum 
    def random_split(set = nil, repeats = false) 
    set ||= 1..self 
    set = [*set] 
    return if set.empty? || set.min > self || set.inject(0, :+) < self 
    tried_numbers = [] 
    while (not_tried = (set - tried_numbers).select {|n| n <= self }).any? 
     tried_numbers << number = not_tried.sample 
     return [number] if number == self 
     new_set = set.dup 
     new_set.delete_at(new_set.index(number)) unless repeats 
     randomized_rest = (self-number).random_split(new_set, repeats) 
     return [number] + randomized_rest if randomized_rest 
    end 
    end 
end 

30.random_split(3..10) 

一般来说,上面的代码涵盖了很多情况。你可以在没有任何参数的情况下执行它,它会假定它是从1到给定数字中选择数字,并且结果集不应该包含任何重复。您可以选择传递给定数量的设置。如果您通过[1,2,3,4,4,4],则需要注意4不会重复3次以上。如果第二个参数设置为true,它将允许设置元素在结果中出现两次或更多次。

+1

你试过了吗?100.random_split(1..10)' – bjhaid 2014-09-26 01:44:41

+0

@bjhaid - 谢谢,最终会返回零,但应该比检查所有可能的情况更聪明。现在修复。 – BroiSatse 2014-09-26 01:47:37

+0

我认为这个问题是不明确的,这使得它很难得到一个*正确*答案 – bjhaid 2014-09-26 01:48:47

0

不是在世界上最好的算法中(它的一些试验和错误),但嘿,CPU周期很便宜如今...这应该对每一个号码的工作:

def split_this_number_into_several_numbers_randomly(a_number, min_number_to_start_from) 
    random_numbers = [0] 

    until (random_numbers.inject(&:+) == a_number) 
    random_numbers << rand(min_number_to_start_from..a_number/3) # replace 30 here, I assumed you wanted up to 1/3 of the original number 
    if (r = random_numbers.detect { |x| random_numbers.count(x) > 1}) then random_numbers.delete(r) end # so we have all unique numbers 
    random_numbers.pop if random_numbers.inject(&:+) >= a_number - min_number_to_start_from && random_numbers.inject(&:+) != a_number 
    end 
    random_numbers.delete_if{ |x| x == 0 } 
end 

,当然,有些代码对其进行测试:

all_true = true 
1000.times do 
    arr = split_this_number_into_several_numbers_randomly(30, 3) 
    all_true == false unless arr.inject(&:+) == 30 
    all_true == false unless arr.size == arr.uniq.size 
end 

p all_true #=> true 
0

的OP已确认关于该问题的是随机选择是,以反映下面的过程的注释:“选择3和10之间不同的数目的所有组合([3],[3, 4],[3,5,6,8,9],.. [9,10],[10]),抛出所有不加总和为30的组合,并选择o那些随机离开的人“。以下是实现这一点的直接方式。可以提高效率,但这将是很多工作。

代码

def arrays(sum, range) 
    largest_sum = (range.first+range.last)*(range.last-range.first+1)/2 
    (raise ArgumentError, 
    "largest sum for range = #{largest_sum}") if sum > largest_sum 
    avail = [*range] 
    b = -(2*range.last + 1.0) 
    c = 8.0*sum 
    min_nbr = ((-b - (b*b - c)**0.5)/2).ceil.to_i 
    max_nbr = ((-1.0 + (1.0 + c)**0.5)/2).to_i 
    (min_nbr..max_nbr).each_with_object([]) { |n, a| 
    a.concat(avail.combination(n).select { |c| c.inject(:+) == sum }) } 
end 

min_nbr注和max_nbr采用二次公式,以确定其可以总和为sum不同号码的数目的范围内。

例子

sum = 30 
range = (3..10) 
arr = arrays(sum, range) # all combinations that sum to 30 
    #=> [[3, 8, 9, 10], [4, 7, 9, 10], [5, 6, 9, 10], [5, 7, 8, 10], 
    # [6, 7, 8, 9], 
    # [3, 4, 5, 8, 10], [3, 4, 6, 7, 10], [3, 4, 6, 8, 9], 
    # [3, 5, 6, 7, 9], [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]] 

(Solution time: well under 1 sec.) 

10.times { p arr[rand(arr.size)] } # 10 random selections 
    #=> [3, 4, 6, 8, 9] 
    # [3, 4, 6, 8, 9] 
    # [5, 7, 8, 10] 
    # [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 8, 10] 
    # [6, 7, 8, 9] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 8, 10] 
    # [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] 
    # [6, 7, 8, 9] 
    # [3, 4, 6, 7, 10] 

sum = 60 
range = (3..10) 
arr = arrays(sum, range) 
    #=> in `arrays': largest sum for range = 52 (ArgumentError) 

两个更多...

sum = 60 
range = (3..20) 
arr = arrays(sum, range) # all combinations that sum to 60 
arr.size 
    #=> 1092 
(Solution time: about 1 sec.) 
10.times { p arr[rand(arr_size)] } # 10 random selections 
    #=> [12, 14, 15, 19] 
    # [3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 13, 16] 
    # [3, 6, 7, 9, 15, 20] 
    # [3, 8, 14, 17, 18] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 13, 18] 
    # [3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 15] 
    # [5, 6, 7, 8, 14, 20] 
    # [4, 5, 9, 11, 15, 16] 
    # [4, 5, 8, 13, 14, 16] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20] 

sum = 100 
range = (3..30) 
arr = arrays(sum, range) # all combinations that sum to 100 
arr.size 
    #=> 54380 
(Solution time: 3 or 4 minutes) 
10.times { p arr[rand(arr_size)] } # 10 random selections 
    #=> [3, 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 23] 
    # [4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 17, 25] 
    # [4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 17, 21, 29] 
    # [9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20] 
    # [6, 9, 10, 23, 25, 27] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 29] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 15, 17, 26] 
    # [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 22, 28] 
    # [3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 15, 30] 
    # [6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 18, 21] 
1

分割数称为integer partition。下面是基于Marc-André Lafortune's recursive algorithm一个解决方案:

def expand(n, max = n) 
    return [[]] if n == 0 
    [max, n].min.downto(1).flat_map do |i| 
    expand(n-i, i).map{|rest| [i, *rest]} 
    end 
end 

expand(30).select { |a| a.size >= 3 && a.size <= 10 }.sample(5) 
#=> [[15, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1], 
# [9, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1], 
# [13, 10, 4, 2, 1], 
# [8, 8, 7, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1], 
# [8, 6, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1]] 

注意可能的分区的数量变得非常大:30 5604个分区,100具有190569292个分区和1000具有2.4 × 1031分区。

+0

其他答案的作者 - 包括我 - 解释问题为随机选择''3'之间30'和'10'那笔一组不同的号码之一。 (你可以用替换'a.size> = 3..''a.min> = 3 && a.max <= 10&a.reduce(:+)== 30',但是这不是非常有效的,因为可能的设置大小的范围可以预先确定,减少用'expand'生成的组合的数量。)也许OP会澄清。 – 2014-09-27 21:24:16