2013-06-21 76 views
0

打扰我的长篇文章。我会发布代码,以便更容易理解我面临的问题。看起来如果一个有信号的套接字被添加到epoll实例中,那么epoll实例上的epoll_wait将不会被阻塞。下面的例子已经让我相信这一点:epoll_wait阻塞信号插座

#include <sys/socket.h> 
#include <netinet/in.h> 
#include <arpa/inet.h> 
#include <stdio.h> 
#include <stdlib.h> 
#include <unistd.h> 
#include <errno.h> 
#include <string.h> 
#include <sys/types.h> 
#include <time.h> 
#include <sys/epoll.h> 

int MAX_EVENT_COUNT = 10; 

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) 
{ 

int epollfd = epoll_create(MAX_EVENT_COUNT); 
if (epollfd == -1) 
{ 
printf("\n Error : epoll_create \n"); 
return 1; 
} 

epoll_event ev; 
memset(&ev,0,sizeof(ev)); 
ev.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET; 

int pipefd[2]; 
if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) 
{ 
perror("pipe"); 
exit(EXIT_FAILURE); 
} 

char ch = 'a'; 
write(pipefd[1], &ch, 1); 

if (epoll_ctl(epollfd , EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pipefd[0], &ev) == -1) 
{ 
printf("\n Error : epoll add result \n"); 
return 1; 
} 

epoll_event rawResult [MAX_EVENT_COUNT]; 
int32_t res = epoll_wait(epollfd, rawResult, MAX_EVENT_COUNT, -1); 

if(res!=1) 
{ 
printf("\n Epoll problem \n"); 
} 
else 
{ 
printf("\n OK \n"); 
} 

} 

但是下面的例子是几乎相同的,但这次我一个信号插座添加到epoll的,此时epoll_wait调用块

#include <sys/socket.h> 
#include <netinet/in.h> 
#include <arpa/inet.h> 
#include <stdio.h> 
#include <stdlib.h> 
#include <unistd.h> 
#include <errno.h> 
#include <string.h> 
#include <sys/types.h> 
#include <time.h> 
#include <sys/epoll.h> 

int MAX_EVENT_COUNT = 10; 

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) 
{ 
int listenfd = 0; 
{ 
struct sockaddr_in serv_addr; 

char sendBuff[1025]; 

listenfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); 
memset(&serv_addr, '0', sizeof(serv_addr)); 
memset(sendBuff, '0', sizeof(sendBuff)); 

serv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; 
serv_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); 
serv_addr.sin_port = htons(5000); 

bind(listenfd, (struct sockaddr*)&serv_addr, sizeof(serv_addr)); 

listen(listenfd, 10); 
} 


int sockfd = 0, n = 0; 
char recvBuff[1024]; 
struct sockaddr_in serv_addr; 

memset(recvBuff, '0',sizeof(recvBuff)); 
if((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0) 
{ 
printf("\n Error : Could not create socket \n"); 
return 1; 
} 

memset(&serv_addr, '0', sizeof(serv_addr)); 

serv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; 
serv_addr.sin_port = htons(5000); 

if(inet_pton(AF_INET, "127.0.0.1", &serv_addr.sin_addr)<=0) 
{ 
printf("\n inet_pton error occured\n"); 
return 1; 
    } 

if(connect(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&serv_addr, sizeof(serv_addr)) < 0) 
{ 
printf("\n Error : Connect Failed \n"); 
return 1; 
} 

int connfd = accept(listenfd, (struct sockaddr*)NULL, NULL); 
int epollfd = epoll_create(MAX_EVENT_COUNT); 
if (epollfd == -1) 
{ 
printf("\n Error : epoll_create \n"); 
return 1; 
} 

epoll_event ev; 
memset(&ev,0,sizeof(ev)); 
ev.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET; 

if (epoll_ctl(epollfd , EPOLL_CTL_ADD, sockfd, &ev) == -1) 
{ 
printf("\n Error : epoll add result \n"); 
return 1; 
} 

epoll_event rawResult [MAX_EVENT_COUNT]; 
int32_t res = epoll_wait(epollfd, rawResult, MAX_EVENT_COUNT, -1); 

} 

回答

2

如果它正在等待的文件描述符没有事件供其报告,epoll_wait()将会阻塞。就你而言,我不相信你已经达到了epoll_wait()。假设你的程序已经通过了connect()accept(),那么你没有在连接上写任何数据(在sockfd上),所以epoll_wait()将不会检测到connfd上的任何事件。

这与您的第一个程序有所不同,在pipefd[1]上写入一个字节的数据之前,请致电pipefd[0]上的epoll_wait()

+0

我明白你的意思,但它对我来说似乎仍然不合逻辑,因为epoll是tcp层下的“原始”,所以它应该将三次握手作为数据报告。此外,有些人似乎正在使用它(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2875002/non-blocking-tcp-connect-with-epoll) –

+0

@YordanPavlov:你没有执行异步'accept()'。如果你想让tcp'SYN'触发'epoll_wait()'唤醒,你需要在监听套接字上轮询,而不是由'accept()'返回的套接字轮询。在accept()返回套接字之后,三次握手(或者三种方式中的至少两种)已经完成。 – jxh

+0

感谢您的回复,您似乎参考了服务器端。在我的情况下,我在客户端套接字轮询,我期待的SYN-ACK触发epoll_wait()。 –