我发布了这个问题几个小时前,但我想我删除它!真的很抱歉...我正在研究Project Euler Problem 17.只是稍微关闭项目欧拉#17
虽然还有其他更明显的解决方案,但作为一个学习练习,我接近了想要使用递归解决问题的问题。我也希望某些代码片段稍后可以在其他情况下使用。问题描述本身位于代码顶部的文档字符串中,对于那些不熟悉的代码。
这里是有问题的代码:
"""If the numbers 1 to 5 are written out in words:
one, two, three, four, five
then there are 3 + 3 + 5 + 4 + 4 = 19 letters used in total.
If all the numbers from 1 to 1000 (one thousand) inclusive were written out in words,
how many letters would be used?
NOTE: Do not count spaces or hyphens. For example, 342 (three hundred and forty-two)
contains 23 letters and 115 (one hundred and fifteen) contains 20 letters. The use of
"and" when writing out numbers is in compliance with British usage.
"""
import collections
import re
SMALLS = [(0, "zero"),
(1, "one"),
(2, "two"),
(3, "three"),
(4, "four"),
(5, "five"),
(6, "six"),
(7, "seven"),
(8, "eight"),
(9, "nine"),
(10, "ten"),
(11, "eleven"),
(12, "twelve"),
(13, "thirteen"),
(14, "fourteen"),
(15, "fifteen"),
(16, "sixteen"),
(17, "seventeen"),
(18, "eighteen"),
(19, "nineteen")]
MULTS_OF_TEN = [(20, "twenty"),
(30, "thirty"),
(40, "forty"),
(50, "fifty"),
(60, "sixty"),
(70, "seventy"),
(80, "eighty"),
(90, "ninety")]
HUNDRED = [(100, "hundred")]
BIGS = [(1000, "thousand"),
(10**6, "million"),
(10**9, "billion")]
# other bigs: trillion, quadrillion, quintillion, sextillion, septillion, octillion, nonillion, decillion,
# undecillion, duodecillion, tredecillion, quattuordecillion, quindecillion, sexdecillion,
# septendecillion, octodecillion, novemdecillion, vigintillion
SMALLS = collections.OrderedDict(reversed(SMALLS))
MULTS_OF_TEN = collections.OrderedDict(reversed(MULTS_OF_TEN))
HUNDRED = collections.OrderedDict(reversed(HUNDRED))
BIGS = collections.OrderedDict(reversed(BIGS))
def int_to_words(num, follows_hundreds=False):
"""Retuns the text-equivelent of num, using recursion for distinct
pieces.
"""
def do_chunk(n,
num_text_map,
include_quotient=True,
is_hundreds=False):
for x in num_text_map:
quotient = n // x
remainder = n % x
if n == x: return num_text_map[x]
if quotient and remainder:
quotient_text = (int_to_words(quotient) + " " + num_text_map[x]) \
if include_quotient else \
(num_text_map[x])
remainder_text = int_to_words(remainder, follows_hundreds=True) \
if is_hundreds else \
int_to_words(remainder)
return quotient_text + " " + remainder_text
elif quotient:
quotient_text = (int_to_words(quotient) + " " + num_text_map[x]) \
if include_quotient else \
(num_text_map[x])
return quotient_text
return False
result = do_chunk(num, BIGS)
if result: return result
result = do_chunk(num, HUNDRED, is_hundreds=True)
if result: return result
result = do_chunk(num, MULTS_OF_TEN, include_quotient=False)
if result and follows_hundreds: return "and " + result
if result: return result
result = do_chunk(num, SMALLS)
if result and follows_hundreds: return "and " + result
if result: return result
def count_letters(string):
looking_for = "[a-z]"
instances = re.findall(looking_for, string)
return len(instances)
def tally_letters(start, end):
total_letters = 0
for i in range(start, end + 1):
total_letters += count_letters(int_to_words(i))
return total_letters
这里是程序的输出,对预期的解决方案相比。
>>> answer = tally_letters(1, 1000)
>>> assert answer == 21124
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#3>", line 1, in <module>
assert answer == 21124
AssertionError
>>> answer
1: 21118
它让我感到困惑,我得到了6分的差异。在此先感谢您的帮助。
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/413172-numbers-and-plural-words-as-spoken-english/ –